An alternative route to charge density wave formation in multi-band systems

Enlarged view: Figure 3.17
Figure 3.17: Temperature dependence of the high energy Raman spectra in ErTe3. (A) At 262 K there is no difference in the electronic excitations at high energy for both polarizations. The insets sketch the incoming and scattered photon polarizations. (B) At 164 K the anisotropy between the two polarizations is already well resolved. (C) In the low temperature limit, the electronic gaps with edges at 800 and 2800 cm-1 (dashed lines) for both CDWs are fully developed. The upper left and lower right insets show the temperature dependences of both CDW gaps, using the same color-code.

The common view of charge density wave (CDW) formation was originally posed by Kohn: the tendency towards ordering is particularly strong in low dimensions, because the Fermi surface has parallel parts, referred to as nesting. This leads to a divergence in the Lindhard susceptibility, determining the magnitude and direction of the ordering vector Q. However, several publications raise the question as to whether nesting alone is sufficient to explain the observed ordering direction Q, particularly in dimensions higher than one. A central question is whether the selection of the CDW ordering vector is always driven by an electronic instability, or if the ordering vector could instead be determined by a lattice distortion driven by some other mechanism exploiting the role of the electron-phonon coupling.

For exploring a possible relation between anisotropic electron-phonon coupling and CDW ordering selection, it is desirable to map out the coupling strength in momentum space. To this goal, we analyze data from Raman experiments (Fig. 3.17) and the related selection rules for the CDW ErTe3 material (TCDW1 = 265 K, followed by a second one at TCDW2 = 155 K) and demonstrate that the lifting of band degeneracies enhances the light-scattering sensitivity (known as focusing effect) and, concomitantly, the electron-phonon coupling at ordering vectors that do not coincide with those predicted by nesting alone. Hence, while electron-phonon coupling is known to be important in CDW systems, on a microscopic basis the focusing effect seems to be a more generic paradigm for multiband materials.

Related paper

JavaScript has been disabled in your browser